Kimi K3
Realtime · Global- Monthly API spend
- $165.00
- Cost / accepted answer
- $0.0183
- Quality assumption
- 90%
$3 input · $0.3 cache read · $15 output / 1M
Official source ↗Compare Moonshot Kimi and Alibaba Qwen API token costs while preserving region, input band, context, cache, and execution-mode rules.
Both sides receive the same requests and token counts. Set separate quality pass rates so a low token price cannot hide rejected answers.
$3 input · $0.3 cache read · $15 output / 1M
Official source ↗$1.65 input · $0.33 cache read · $4.95 output / 1M
Official source ↗At the entered pass rates, its estimated cost per accepted answer is $0.0083. This is scenario math, not evidence that the selected models have equal capabilities.
API rates are USD per one million tokens. The estimate excludes cache writes or storage, tools, retries, regional uplifts, taxes, latency failures, and consumer-plan quotas.
Qwen can vary by region, input size, and cache mode while Kimi separates standard and batch paths. Use only tiers the intended request actually qualifies for.
4 currently effective cards are available in the calculator. Context bands and regions remain separate.
Open Kimi / Moonshot AI pricing6 currently effective cards are available in the calculator. A missing cache rate is never treated as free.
Open Qwen / Alibaba Cloud pricingThere is no provider-wide answer. Cost depends on the exact model tier, input and output size, cache behavior, region, execution mode, and the share of answers that pass the workload’s quality bar.
No. The calculator keeps separate quality-pass assumptions so you can enter measured results. Equal token counts or prices do not establish equivalent capabilities.
No. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, and other consumer-plan quotas are separate from API token billing.