DEEPSEEK / KIMI / MOONSHOT AI

DeepSeek vs Kimi API pricing calculator.

Compare DeepSeek and Moonshot Kimi API spend without hiding effective dates, cache modes, context tiers, or batch-only discounts.

DeepSeek
2 models
Published range $0.22$3.96
Kimi / Moonshot AI
4 models
Published range $0.95$15
Verified
2026-08-16
Unit
USD / 1M tokens
SHARED WORKLOAD

Change the models, not the accounting.

Both sides receive the same requests and token counts. Set separate quality pass rates so a low token price cannot hide rejected answers.

SAME WORKLOAD · TWO API RATE CARDS
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Flash

Off-peak · scheduled UTC windows · Global
Monthly API spend
$9.90
Cost / accepted answer
$0.0011
Quality assumption
90%

$0.22 input · $0.007 cache read · $0.66 output / 1M

Official source ↗
Kimi / Moonshot AI

Kimi K3

Realtime · Global
Monthly API spend
$165.00
Cost / accepted answer
$0.0183
Quality assumption
90%

$3 input · $0.3 cache read · $15 output / 1M

Official source ↗
QUALITY-ADJUSTED RESULTDeepSeek is lower in this scenario.

At the entered pass rates, its estimated cost per accepted answer is $0.0011. This is scenario math, not evidence that the selected models have equal capabilities.

API rates are USD per one million tokens. The estimate excludes cache writes or storage, tools, retries, regional uplifts, taxes, latency failures, and consumer-plan quotas.

DeepSeek time-window prices and Kimi batch or cache tiers apply only under their documented conditions. A scheduled or batch rate is not a general on-demand price.

DEEPSEEK

Inspect the exact rate card

4 currently effective cards are available in the calculator. Context bands and regions remain separate.

Open DeepSeek pricing
KIMI / MOONSHOT AI

Keep billing scope intact

4 currently effective cards are available in the calculator. A missing cache rate is never treated as free.

Open Kimi / Moonshot AI pricing
QUESTIONS

Before you call a winner.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek or Kimi / Moonshot AI?

There is no provider-wide answer. Cost depends on the exact model tier, input and output size, cache behavior, region, execution mode, and the share of answers that pass the workload’s quality bar.

Does this comparison prove the models have equal quality?

No. The calculator keeps separate quality-pass assumptions so you can enter measured results. Equal token counts or prices do not establish equivalent capabilities.

Are consumer subscriptions included?

No. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Kimi, and other consumer-plan quotas are separate from API token billing.